TTA vs TPLO 2020 Cruciate ligament injuries in dogs can significantly impact their mobility and overall quality of life. As veterinary medicine advances, Tibial Tuberosity Advancement (TTA) and Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy (TPLO) have emerged as prominent surgical techniques for treating these injuries. In this article, we will compare TTA and TPLO in 2020, shedding light on their unique features, benefits, and outcomes.

An Overview:TTA vs TPLO 2020

In 2020, TTA and TPLO remained popular choices for cruciate ligament repair, with each technique offering distinct advantages and considerations. Let's take a closer look at these surgical approaches.

1. TTA, also known as Tibial Tuberosity Advancement, is a surgical procedure designed to address cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) injuries in dogs. By advancing the tibial tuberosity, the angle of the patellar ligament is altered, reducing strain on the injured ligament. TTA aims to stabilize the knee joint, promote healing, and restore mobility for dogs.

2. TTA TPLO, or Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy, is another commonly used surgical technique for CCL repair. Developed by Dr. Barclay Slocum, TPLO involves cutting the tibia and repositioning the plateau to modify joint mechanics. By changing the tibial plateau angle, TPLO aims to stabilize the knee joint and restore normal weight-bearing capacity.

Key Differences between TTA and TPLO

When comparing TTA vs TPLO in 2020, several factors set these surgical techniques apart:

1. Surgical Approach: TTA involves altering the angle of the patellar ligament, whereas TPLO focuses on modifying the tibial plateau angle. The choice between TTA and TPLO depends on factors such as the dog's anatomy and the surgeon's expertise.

2. Recovery Time: Recovery time can vary between TTA and TPLO procedures. Both techniques require a period of restricted activity and rehabilitation, but TPLO may involve a longer healing process due to the bone-cutting involved.

3. Implant Usage: TTA typically utilizes implants like titanium cages or bone screws to secure the tibial tuberosity in its new position. Conversely, TPLO does not rely on implants but instead relies on the osteotomy cut and bone healing for stability.


In 2020, TTA and TPLO stood as prominent surgical techniques for cruciate ligament repair in dogs. TTA offered the advantage of altering the angle of the patellar ligament, while TPLO focused on modifying the tibial plateau angle. Factors such as surgical approach, recovery time, and implant usage influenced the selection between these techniques. To determine the most suitable option for your furry companion, it is crucial to consult with a veterinary specialist experienced in both TTA and TPLO. The decision should take into account the individual dog's condition, overall health, and the surgeon's recommendation. Regardless of the chosen method, both TTA and TPLO aimed to provide dogs with enhanced mobility and improved quality of life following cruciate ligament injuries.

Recommended Posts

No comment yet, add your voice below!

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *